How to Control Surface Roughness in 3D Printing Projects

Introduction

What is Surface Roughness in 3D Printing?

  • Ra (Average Roughness): This metric measures the average height of surface deviations from the ideal mean line. A lower Ra indicates a smoother surface.
  • Rz (Average Maximum Height): This metric measures the height difference between the highest peak and the lowest valley in the surface profile.

Factors Influencing Surface Roughness

Several factors contribute to the roughness of a 3D-printed part. Understanding these factors can help engineers and designers control and optimize surface quality.

1. 3D Printing Technology

Different 3D printing technologies affect surface roughness in various ways:

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): In FDM, material is extruded layer by layer. The surface roughness tends to be higher due to the visible layer lines and the way the material is deposited. As the material cools and solidifies, it can leave behind a rough texture. This is especially noticeable in materials like ABS, which are more prone to warping and inconsistency during cooling.

Roughness comparison of fdm and sla 3D printed parts
Roughness comparison of fdm and sla printed parts

Stereolithography (SLA): SLA uses a laser to cure liquid resin, layer by layer, into a solid. The result is generally a much smoother surface, as the resin cures to a finer detail and doesn’t leave the same visible layer lines as FDM printing.

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS): Both SLS and DMLS use a laser to fuse powdered material into solid form. While these technologies can produce durable parts, the powder particles can cause roughness, especially in the “as printed” condition. For SLS, powder adhesion is a key factor, and this can result in rougher surfaces compared to SLA or FDM.

2. Material Properties

The material used in 3D printing plays a critical role in surface finish. For example:

PLA (Polylactic Acid): PLA is known for its smoother surface finishes compared to other materials like ABS. PLA is less likely to exhibit layer lines due to its more consistent extrusion properties.

ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene): ABS tends to show rougher finishes. It’s also more prone to warping, which can add to the irregularities on the surface. Parts made from ABS often require additional post-processing to improve surface smoothness.

Nylon, Polycarbonate, and Other Engineering Plastics: These materials can exhibit a wide range of surface qualities, with some requiring chemical or mechanical smoothing to achieve the desired finish.

3. Layer Height and Resolution

The layer height and resolution settings used during printing significantly influence surface roughness.

Smaller Layer Heights: Using smaller layer heights results in thinner layers, which makes the transition between layers less visible and the overall surface smoother. However, this also increases printing time and complexity.

Higher Resolution: Higher resolution settings allow for finer details, which can reduce the visibility of the layer lines. This improves the surface quality but also increases the computational power and time needed for printing.

4. Post-Processing Techniques

After printing, several post-processing methods can be used to improve surface smoothness:

Sanding and Polishing: These are the most common mechanical post-processing techniques. Sanding can smooth out rough areas, and polishing adds a glossy finish.

Chemical Smoothing: Techniques like chemical vapor polishing are used to smooth out the surfaces of parts, especially in technologies like SLS. The part is exposed to a chemical vapor that melts the surface slightly, filling in small rough areas for a smoother finish.

Comparison before and after vapor smoothing
Comparison before and after vapor smoothing-sls

Plating and Coating: For certain applications, electroplating or coating a part with a smooth, hard layer can significantly reduce roughness and improve the finish.

SLA printed parts electroplating effect
SLA printed parts electroplating effect

Common Surface Roughness Values for Different 3D Printing Technologies

Comparison of surface roughness between hand polishing and mirror polishing
Comparison of surface roughness between hand polishing and mirror polishing
TechnologyMaterialRa (µm)Rz (µm)
FDMPLA~65~200
SLAIndustrial White Resin1.510.1
SLSPA 12 (as printed)10-1259.9-69.4
DMLSMetal Parts735

Conclusion

Surface roughness is more than just an aesthetic consideration in 3D printing; it has functional implications for a part’s performance. Whether it’s affecting the aerodynamics of an automotive part, the fit of a mechanical component, or the comfort of a medical device, understanding and controlling surface roughness is key to achieving high-quality 3D-printed parts.

By considering factors like printing technology, material choice, layer height, and post-processing techniques, engineers in ProtoSoon can optimize your 3D prints for better surface finishes.

Scroll to Top